What is the difference between readability and instapaper

The default Lyon is a good serif font, but you can switch to Helvetica or Georgia if you like. Readability is the read-later service underdog.

I like the Readability extension because it supports mappable keyboard shortcuts. It supports keyboard shortcuts , and you can highlight text and send articles directly to Evernote. When it comes to display options, Clearly basically lets you go crazy. You can create a template where you can specify everything from header font, article font, link color, font height, and line height. But you get no options. No dark mode, no font customization, nothing. Although I found it a bit slow when loading.

How this tutorial helping you? What is actual time in which this method complete? What are the supported Device? PC Laptop or Desktop. In case if you have any query regards this article you may ask us.

Also, please share your love by sharing this article with your friends. Education: This guide or tutorial is just for educational purposes. Our Contact : Kindly use our contact page regards any help.

You may also use our social and accounts by following us on Whatsapp , Facebook , and Twitter for your questions.

We always love to help you. We answer your questions within hours Weekend off. Channel: If you want the latest software updates and discussion about any software in your pocket, then here is our Telegram channel.

Here, we'll put them head to head to help you choose which app is right for you. Instapaper solves a very basic problem. You find something to read online but can't read it at that moment. Maybe it's a long read and you don't have the time, maybe you found it while you're at work and want to save it for when you get home, or maybe you're trying to research a topic and you're gathering multiple resources to explore later on. Whatever the case, with a browser extension, or the Share function on your phone, you can send the article to Instapaper.

There, the app will download it into a text-friendly version that you can read even if you lose your internet connection. You can sort your articles into folders, or have them read aloud to you if you prefer listening to them.

This approach is ideal if you want to save interesting stories to read at your leisure. Pocket works similarly but with a stronger emphasis on research and flexible organization. While you can use it as a simple reading list, it also has several features that are ideal for gathering information for a big project. Instead of using folders, Pocket has a robust tagging system. This lets you sort articles into multiple categories and find them easily later.

Pocket Premium will even download copies of your links, so if the original is changed or deleted, you can keep the information for your own reference. It functions as your personal database of sources that you can refer back to over and over. You can use it for casual reading, but it's also built to work as a reference tool. Instapaper and Pocket are both ostensibly designed to be simple reading apps, where you save a link and then read it later.

However, their differences when it comes to organization and reading experiences make for a subjective comparison. Which one is better for you will depend heavily on what you want to save articles for casual reading versus research and how you prefer to read speed reading or on a Kindle versus text-to-speech.

With all that in mind, we focused on these key categories. Click on any one below to jump to the area that's most important to you, or skip to the end to see our complete comparison table. Notes and Research. Sharing and Discovery. For the most part, Instapaper and Pocket support similar platforms. Each offers apps for Android, iOS, and the web for reading the articles you've saved. They also offer browser extensions for common browsers like Chrome and Safari. That means you can save articles from most places and read your saved articles on most devices.

But there are a few key places where the two differ. Instapaper offers a Kindle app for Amazon's eReaders that let you read text-based versions of your saved articles. These text-only versions are designed to be easily read on eInk displays.

You can transfer the articles via USB, or set up wireless delivery via a newsletter that can be automatically downloaded to your Kindle as frequently as once per day.

Once downloaded, the articles are available even when you're away from wifi. The Premium subscription also lets you send articles directly to your Kindle via a bookmarklet. By comparison, Pocket is only available as a standard Android app on the Kindle Fire. If you want to read articles on an eInk tablet, Pocket has a similar partnership with Kobo, but those are far less common.

Pocket, on the other hand, has its own API to integrate with other apps and services and let third-party developers create their own clients. Having said that, Pocket's app directory looks pretty outdated.

To wit, the page still prominently features Google Reader , which went the way of the dinosaurs in Both Instapaper and Pocket are supported by Zapier , which means you can connect either of them to thousands of apps. Click ahead to our section on how to automate Instapaper and Pocket to learn more. Instapaper offers speed reading and more font choices, while Pocket offers better text-to-speech. When it's time to read, Instapaper and Pocket offer similar basic reading features.

You can choose between light, dark, and sepia color schemes, set custom brightness settings for reading mode, and pick from some font options. Pocket only offers a choice of one serif and one sans-serif font, while Instapaper has several fonts to choose from.

The choice of fonts differs by platform, so, for example, you'll find more font choices on iOS than on Android. Both services also download all of your articles so you can read them without an internet connection, which is perfect for reading on the subway or a plane. The two differ more when it comes to text-to-speech. Pocket can read articles aloud as long as you're at least connected to the internet when you start reading an article.

If you lose internet, you can finish listening to an article, but you'll need to reconnect for each new article. Pocket uses its own text-to-speech engine across platforms, so the voice will sound the same everywhere. In our experience, it sounded very natural. You can adjust the playback speed up to 4x normal speed, or down to 0.

You can start listening to your entire feed of articles in a playlist, a feature which Instapaper charges for. All of Pocket's reading features are included for free. Instapaper also offers text-to-speech but with some more limitations. It uses whatever text-to-speech engine is available on the platform you're using.

On iOS, for example, the engine reads one word at a time in a robotic tone, which doesn't flow very very well. Android sounds a little better, but neither is quite as natural as Pocket's text-to-speech. If you change platforms frequently, your listening experience will be inconsistent. You can turn playback speed up to 2x normal speed without paying, but Premium users can go up to 3x.

The difference between 2x and 3x starts to push the bounds of what a person can reasonably process, so most free users should still be satisfied. Instapaper also offers a unique speed reading feature that displays the text of an article one word at a time. You can adjust the speed of this feature from to words per minute. Free users can read up to 10 articles per month this way, while Premium users can use it with no limits.

I'm investing in a relationship A relationship that I can trust to deliver me compelling value on an ongoing basis. It's one thing to swoop in and build a product that looks very much like one that's on the market only free, or whatever. That's not interesting to me. You haven't really accomplished anything valuable. In fact, it's easy to argue you've literally sucked value out of the world. It's another thing to replicate the ability to deserve people's trust that you'll continue to deliver value in new ways I didn't down vote you and I do agree with most of what you've said regarding competition I suspect the rest of HN also agrees.

What you didn't address though is Marco's past relationship with the founders. Specifically he says that he advised the founders, promoted Readability on his website and even created a white-labeled Instapaper version of Readability.

Now they've created a direct competitor to Marco's app. This is generating the sentiment. Oh, well that's very fair. I'm kind of a handful. The reason I don't develop my ViewText any further is that the barrier to entry for this is just to low.

Marco already has an excellent app, now reability will enter his market, along with Apple. ViewText is really good. If you have stopped development, why not dump the code to GitHub? Open source community could use a good text extractor as most of the current ones are pretty bad on server side and Readability's old code requires browser components to work well. BTW, what programming language you used for ViewText?

I'm always ashamed of my code. You're clearly not ashamed of what your code can do , since you showed us the above with no hesitation.

And you shouldn't be, of course. So why be ashamed of the code that accomplishes it? Yep, function over form. And the function part is fantastic in this case. Slightly off-topic: Thanks for ViewText. The barrier to entry may be low, but you are the one who developed it. It works flawlessly, it's fast, it's a delight to use on a mobile device and on the iPad, it doesn't attempt to distract me with ads or premium offers and it's free.

If you don't me asking, how much does it cost to run ViewText?